Comments regarding Aztec Dahlias
Click here to return to Aztec Dahlias's listing.You are viewing only neutral comments
|
Comments:
Rating | Author | Content |
Neutral | zone5girl (17 reviews) | On Apr 26, 2007, zone5girl Painesville, OH (Zone 5b) wrote: Like many others on the dahlia forum stated, my tubers from Aztec were shriveled and they replaced 3 of the 7 tubers I ordered. I am not putting neg. down because I am going to see how these tubers grow first. |
Neutral | sudhira (8 reviews) | On Apr 21, 2007, sudhira Aptos, CA wrote: Tubers rec'd were in very poor condition. 2 had no eyes what so ever, 2 had rotten heads, one had NOID and one had ID written so poorly is could not be read. Numbers on the order sheet had been changed and were confusing. 4 emails sent from 2 different accounts, after approx 1 week an email response was obtained, stating they were busy with orders. I have not heard back from them as of yet. I am sure the owners are kind people with good intentions, but the tubers were very poor quality. I wouldn't have taken them if they had been free. On April 25th, 2007, sudhira changed the rating from negative to neutral and added the following: Okay so I changed from Negative to Neutral...Even though the dahlia tubers were is very poor condition ( not usable )...they did after a few emails, offer to make good on them...I wish them well, and hope they have better quality control next season... |